Tuesday, December 15, 2009

How close is too close?

Two recent events illustrate the predicament that torments defenders daily but otherwise eludes executive attention -- until an adverse consequence, that is. Italian Prime Minister Berlusconi, controversial and flamboyant, liked to mingle with crowds, keeping a Kiplingesque common touch. But after an unstable member of the crowd exhibited an unsophisticated knack for Berlusconi bashing with a blunt object at close range, blood and broken incisors will now make the PM rethink his priorities for personal protection.

The White House party crasher incident with more minor miscreant social climbers deserves rethinking through the same lens. While defenders step up to take the blame the way they take a bullet, part of the ultimate responsibility for such security failures invariably traces to the top. Usually, a rung on that ladder to the top is a social secretary or image handler whose intense focus on photo ops creates or widens the exposure. But, most of the time, it is the protectee who calls the shots and decides when to ignore defender advice and protection.

Ours is a troubled, volatile world. All leaders need to think seriously about their personal security, not just for themselves but for their fellow citizens who placed them in office for a reason. Part of honoring one's constituency and office is being around to do the job. And that means taking security very seriously when in crowds or exposed venues.

- Nick Catrantzos