The Olympic torch, taken objectively, is a marvelously expensive frivolity whose parade through a chain of metropolitan venues hardly offers novelty in the modern age. Until recently, that is, when anti-Chinese fervor made it a target. Whether it is a legitimate protest target is mildly interesting to the security professional. If it is an asset, it needs to be protected. How?
The answer differs little from the steps one would take to defend other assets on the move from hijacking or foul play. The answer is a layered defense. And the chief component is unpredictability. Security measures in such an environment typically include decoys, unannounced schedule changes, and keeping out of the way of where both crowds and antagonists are most likely to appear. Related measures include introducing obstacles and disrupting patterns.
Say what you will about San Francisco's current reputation for extremes. When it came to preventing a nasty scene with the Olympic torch at its only U.S. appearance, this week, San Francisco got it right. Organizers kept the torch in motion, deviated from known and vulnerable routes of travel, and altered all predictable stops well enough to get the Olympic flame in and out of town without missing a beat. That was a vivid demonstration of good security.
– Nick Catrantzos